Van Til’s followers often speak of the “transcendental argument” for the existence of God. Any future edits to the main article for the “Transcendental argument for the existence of God” will need to comply with that worldview simply because they would be taking place on Wikipedia. Some reject the validity of the argument pointing out various flaws, such as a category error involved in the first premise of the argument, namely that just because there's a statement that's universally true it won't make that statement a part of reality in itself. We don’t get physics from Christianity. His published books include The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God, Apologetics to the Glory of God, and Cornelius Van Til, An Analysis of His Thought. The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (TAG) is the argument that attempts to prove the existence of God by arguing that logic, morals, and science ultimately presuppose a supreme being and that God must therefore be the source of logic and morals. Is this nature changeable? The answer must first of all must be the existence of the God of Scripture. The Transcendental Argument for the existence of God (TAG for short) demands a certain sardonic respect due to its sheer ambition. In its full form, it claims that logic (and by extension rationality, sense, morality and any argumentation at all) can only exist if the Christian God does. [4], The TAG is a transcendental argument that attempts to prove that God is the precondition for logic, reason, or morality. Lewis, The Case for Christianity, pg. 32 The Christian apologist has a quick answer: because of God. My article, "The Transcendental Argument for the Nonexistence of God," was originally published in the New Zealand Rationalist and Humanist (Autumn 1996, p. 4). The transcendental method then goes ahead to ask what the necessary conditions of human knowledge are. It’s neither external nor arbitrary. A Brief Response to “The Transcendental Argument for the Non Existence of God” [6] … Transcendental argument (TAG): The goal of this argument is to show that God is the source of logic. The argument proceeds as follows:[5]. If God is bound by logic, logic isn’t arbitrary. Christian Theism as a … Overview. In other words, because Goddidit is claimed to be the answer to every question in epistemology, God necessarily exists. The transcendental argument for the existence of God (TAG) attempts to show that logic, science, ethics and generally every fact of human experience and knowledge are not meaningful apart from a preconditioning belief in the existence of God.Since logic "exists", then so must God. The apologist will try to propose a third option (again, as with Euthyphro): logic is simply a consequence of God’s nature. See also: Do Atheists Borrow From the Christian Worldview? The Transcendental Argument (TAG) challenges the atheist to resolve this any other way. 4. Can God make a rock so heavy that hitting His head with it would explain the change in personality He underwent between the Old Testament and the New Testament? Yes, I want the Patheos Nonreligious Newsletter as well, Identity Politics vs. Transactional Politics. Hence, one can agree that the transcendental argument proper disproves materialism but still not believe in the Christian God. 3. The Transcendental Argument for the Nonexistence of God Michael Martin [This article originally appeared in the Autumn 1996 issue of The New Zealand Rationalist & Humanist.]. (Of course, you could say that if Christians can conclude that the Trinitarian god is both three and one, a mere logical impossibility should be child’s play, but let’s set that aside.). [6] Another issue pointed out is that it's not needed to have a god to have logic or morality. God gave us logic, you say? However, in stating that logic is the creation of god, it is implied that god would not be bound by logic. (To see the Christian case for this argument, read the selection from my book Cross Examined in an earlier post.). The Transcendental Argument for God There are several methods available to the Christian for answering questions about or, challenges to, Christianity from the unbeliever. Hi and welcome back! The transcendental argument for the existence of God (TAG) is an argument within the realm of presuppositional apologetics.It argues that logic, morals, and science ultimately presuppose a theistic worldview, as God must be the "source" of logic and morality. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (TAG) is the argument that attempts to prove the existence of God by arguing that logic, morals, and science ultimately presuppose a supreme being and that God must therefore be the source of logic and morals. ” I am a subscriber to Rationality Rules and there are many good videos where he explains the serious problems with a number of arguments, particularly for the existence of “God.” In your reply to my response, one of the articles you sent a link to was on the topic of Brahman. Do Atheists Borrow From the Christian Worldview? 3. The argument suggests that the Christian… Nothing useful has ever come from resolving a science question by concluding that God did it. Why go to Christianity now to find the fundamental basis for physics? It’s curious then that this God-given logic can’t prove that it was God who did it and not Brahma or Odin or Moloch. First, and this is a minor point, I only “propose” that transcendental argument in the sense that I suggest a form which it may take, not that I endorse it. 2. Here again, he answered to an external reality. The Transcendental Argument Complements the Moral Argument. In a godless universe, something might be a rock and not-a-rock. The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (TAG) is the argument that attempts to prove God's existence by arguing that logic, morals, and science ultimately presuppose a theistic worldview, and that God must be the source of logic and morals. Were God’s hands tied in creating arithmetic, or did he have some creative control? A Dozen Responses to the Transcendental Argument for God. Avoiding logical puzzles invalidates TAG, Many apologists dodge the “Can God make a rock so heavy he can’t lift it?” puzzle by saying that God can’t do anything illogical (for example, here and here)—he can’t make an impossibly heavy rock, a square circle, a married bachelor, and so on. Answer: The transcendental argument for the existence of God is the argument that attempts to prove God’s existence by arguing that logic, morals, and science ultimately presuppose the theistic worldview and that God’s transcendent character is the source of logic and morals. To Van Til, this principle was not only a fact, but an argument for the existence of God. The final version may include changes not present in this version. Hi Chris, Thanks for engaging my paper, it truly is an honor. For arguments that deduce conclusions from some accepted aspect of experience, see. The TAG argument Dr. James Anderson used in the video, using the laws of logic, was similiar to a type of a priori ontological argument and went something along the lines of: Although Immanuel Kant rarely uses the term ‘transcendentalargument’, and when he does it is not in our current sense (cf.Hookway 1999: 180 n. 8), he nonetheless speaks frequently of‘transcendental deductions’, ‘transcendentalexpositions’, and ‘transcendental proofs’, whichroughly speaking have the force of what is today meant by‘transcendental argument’. Get updates from Cross Examined delivered straight to your inbox. Authored by: Mitchell LeBlanc. TAG gives none. Atheism has always been weak on morality. God can’t change it. ", "Responding to the Most Common Arguments for God's Existence", "A Dozen Responses to the Transcendental Argument for God (3 of 3)", "Non-classical Logics: Theory, Applications and Tools", Responses to Atheist Philosopher, Michael Martin, Derrida, Van Til and the Metaphysics of Postmodernism, The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God, Relationship between religion and science, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transcendental_argument_for_the_existence_of_God&oldid=965133728, Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from September 2010, Articles with unsourced statements from January 2020, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. I will be appearing with fellow Patheoser Andrew Hall on his YouTube... Did I read that right? The Transcendental Argument for the existence of God This is an attempt to demonstrate the existence of God using the Laws of Logic, also referred to as Logical Absolutes. Transcendental arguments should not be confused with arguments for the existence of something transcendent. Lately, we've been talking about personal evangelism, the... Counterintuitive Puzzles that Should Be Easy. The Transcendental Argument for God's existence is an argument that attempts to demonstrate the existence of God by showing that God is the foundation of logic, reason, rationality, and morality. That is, none of the abovearguments really prove that God exists. No Dilemma for the Proponent of the Transcendental Argument: A Response to David Reiter James N. Anderson David Reiter has recently argued that presuppositionalists who champion the transcendental argument for God’s existence (“TAG”) face a dilemma: depending on what conclusion the In laying out this case, the apologist is accepting the validity of logic by trying to construct an argument. Is it fixed? Therefore, the TAG differs from thomistic and evidentialist arguments, which posit the existence of God in order to avoid an infinite regress of causes or motions. Anthony C. Genova, "Transcendental Form," Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 11 (1980): 25-34. This is a response to RationalWiki's article on the Transcendental Argument for God. All other Van Tillian transcendental arguments are valid but use unproven and/or false premises. One could engage in an inductive approach which is aligned more closely with … They exist and are sustained by God. It should be noted that all the facts used by the Christian in the above hypotheticalconversation are true. It would be impossible there to be a set of interrelated preconditions that are required for the intelligibility of experience, unless the God of Orthodox Christianity exists. And now that we know that God exists, we can explain why the laws of logic exist. L1. Then logic is arbitrary. ), Please also opt me in for Exclusive Offers from Patheos’s Partners, 10 Tough Questions for the Atheist to Answer (3 of 3). b. The text of RationalWiki's article is in blue. [1] A version was formulated by Immanuel Kant in his 1763 work The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God. They are also sometimes said to be distinct from standard deductive and inductive forms of reasoning, although this has been disputed, for instance by Anthony Genova Graham Bird, The Revolutionary Kant: A Commentary on the Critique of Pure Reason (2006). A Parable. And if not, God was obliged to make arithmetic the way it is and unable to create any other kind. But this is an incredible claim that needs justification. [7] In particular the existence of multiple logic systems with differing axioms such as non-classical logic[8] as well as multiple radically different moral systems[9][10][11][12] constitutes evidence against the idea that logic and morality are actually universals. A Response to John Frame's Rebuttal of The Transcendental Argument for the Nonexistence of God (TANG) Michael Martin . But let’s assume the apologist’s argument and see what happens. The contrary is impossible only if it is self-contradictory when operating on the basis of its own assumptions. For example, 2 + 2 = 4 in our universe. If I don’t accept that God can have no flaws and/or that nonexistence is a flaw, I’ve defeated the ontological argument. [citation needed], "Transcendental argument" redirects here. It was first intended as a reply to the Transcendental argument for the existence of God, which argues that logic, science and morality can only be justified by appealing to the theistic worldview.TANG, however, argues that the reverse is true. You simply asserted with great confidence that Christianity can account for logic. Robert Stern has helped flesh out a definition in his book, Transcendental Arguments: The first, and perhaps most definitive feature, is that these arguments involve a claim of a distinctive form: namely, that one thing (X) is a necessary condition for the possibility of something else (Y), so that (it is said) the latter cannot obtain without the former. If God’s role here is important, a godless universe must be dramatically different. In his article on The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God Mitch Leblanc relied heavily upon a strong Modal TAG and arguments that have been brought against it.1 In subsequent discussion about the article he claimed, repeatedly, that this was only a formal representation of what Bahnsen offered in his debate with Gordon Stein. The Whole of Christian Theism by a Single Argument 2 II. The following is his brief reply to Michael Martin’s caricature of the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God which he has labeled his Transcendental Argument for the Non-Existence of God. [1], A version was formulated by Immanuel Kant in his 1763 work The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God, and most contemporary formulations of the transcendental argument have been developed within the framework of Christian presuppositional apologetics.[2]. Then God is again bound by logic. The transcendental argument for the existence of God (TAG) is an argument within the realm of presuppositional apologetics. Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Therefore, God exists. A Parable. The transcendental theist apologist claims that we only have logic on which to rely because it was provided for us by god. A classical Platonist would fall into this category. The question is ill-formed. A transcendental argument generally tries to prove that if X is a necessary precondition for Y, then if Y does exist then it follows that X must exist by necessity. By saying that God can’t make something that’s logically impossible, however, they create another problem as God’s actions become constrained by an external logic. But this simply rephrases the problem. Martin makes three separate arguments: . Greg Bahnsen applied this in a famous (in our circles) debate with atheist Gordon Stein. Next, notice that we’ve never gotten physics from Christianity before. Prior exemplars of sucharguments may perhaps by claimed, such as Aristotle’s proof of theprinciple of non-contradiction (see Metaphysics1005… The Transcendental Argument is merely semi-circular: It remains logically valid. It is this that we ought to mean when we say that we reason from the impossibility of the contrary. Could God create logic and mathematics? God created logic, and logic is the way it is because God made it so. What besides God could possibly explain the existence of something fundamental like logic? If Knowledge Then God (2005) — a paper in which I summarize Van Til’s transcendental argument (actually multiple versions of it) and contrast it with the theistic arguments of Alvin Plantinga. ... Everything you asserted prior to this was either a failed argument to prove logic comes from god or else the bare unsupported "acknowledgement" that logic comes from god. Have you ever thought about what grounds the laws of logic and mathematics? In short, the transcendental argument for the existence of God (or TAG) states that the Christian God must be presupposed for any fact to be rendered… If it convinced you, you’d be a deist, not a Christian. Furthermore, the existence of theorems like Goedel's completeness theorem and the soundness theorems for classical logic provide justification for some logic systems like classical propositional logic without using any god hypotheses thus contradicting the first premise of the argument. Some Christian philosophers have made the incredible argument that logic, science and morality presuppose the truth of the Christian world view because logic, science and morality depend on the truth of this world view []. But because the laws of logic are a properly basic belief, the circle is broken. This argument is of particular interest to me because I was introduced to it in a radio interview—not the best place for careful study and contemplation before stating one’s intellectual position—but more on that later. If He didn't, we could not rely upon logic, reason, morality, and other absolute universals (which are required and assumed to live in this universe, let alone to debate), and could not exist in a materialist universe where there are no absolute standards or an absolute Lawgiver. Draft version of a paper submitted for publication. In other words, they are distinct from both arguments that appeal to a transcendent intuition or sense as evidence, and classical apologetics arguments that move from direct evidence to the existence of a transcendent thing. Also, send me the Nonreligious Newsletter. THE SCOPE AND LIMITS OF VAN TIL’S TRANSCENDENTAL ARGUMENT: A RESPONSE TO JOHN FRAME Michael H. Warren, Jr. Last revised 9/19/2015 Table of Contents Page I. A Dozen Responses to the Transcendental Argument for God May 1, 2017 Bob Seidensticker Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Or is he bound by them? Not only does it demonstrate that the Christian worldview is necessarily true, it refutes the non-Christian worldview in every form it takes by reducing that view to absurdity. Abstract: I briefly trace the origin of the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God and present both an informal and formal version of the argument. The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God, "Does Induction Presume the Existence of the Christian God? He acts logically because he must, just like the rest of us. Church and ministry leadership resources to better equip, train and provide ideas for today's church and ministry leaders, like you. Yes, God is the first cause, the designer of life,the resurrected Christ, the Author of Scripture, and the Savior of Christians.Yet the way these facts are used is not decisive. This page was last edited on 29 June 2020, at 16:13. Martin is wrong in this assumption, and thus by admitting that if the transcendental argument is true the atheist would be inconsistent, he shows that this is a positive proof for the Christian worldview. Think about God creating arithmetic for a moment. We know that they work, but why? Something can’t simultaneously be a rock and not-a-rock. The Christian apologist would be obliged to use different arguments to show that the deity was the Christian god, not some other god. There's Nothing Supernatural About Evangelism. Yes, the Bible tells us how everything got started, but science gives the evidence to make clear that the Bible is wrong. On logic, Martin's argument proceeds thus:. People depend upon logic and morality, showing that they depend upon the universal, immaterial, and abstract realities which could not exist in a materialist universe but presupposes (presumes) the existence of an immaterial and absolute God. This creates a Euthyphro-like dilemma: either God is bound by an external logic (and God answers to a fixed logic that he can’t change) or he’s not (and logic becomes arbitrary—it is what it is simply because God said so, and he could change it if he wanted to). [3] and Graham Bird. 1 The oversimplified argument, which is expanded in outline form below, goes as follows: Logical absolutes exist. How could God be the origin of logic if he’s bound by it? Some of the above arguments are very weak: appeals to personal experience,vicious circular reasoning, and appeals to a first cause. But the apologist’s argument tells us that, without God, logic is up for grabs. Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world. TAG is a deist argument. God is a necessary precondition for logic and morality (because these are immaterial, yet real universals). Also, send me the Nonreligious Newsletter and special offers. No honest seeker of the truth says, “I don’t know what causes this thing … so therefore I do know! Could God have made 2 + 2 = 9? It must’ve been God.”. — commenter GubbaBumpkin, (This is an update of a post that originally appeared 11/30/13. Without God there is no meaning (truth, rationality, etc. The transcendental argument for God (TAG) destroys all speculations and every pernicious thought raised against the knowledge of Christ. by Matt Slick. An answer to another response to the Transcendental Argument. A while ago, I watched a youtube video by Rationality Rules entitled, “Matt Slick’s Transcendental Argument – Debunked (TAG / Presuppositionalism Refuted). A godless universe could then have no logic or different logical rules. The Theistic Preconditions of Knowledge (2006) — an argument that human knowledge presupposes the existence of God. Lewis’s Transcendental Argument may have a lot of entailments and may need the amount of explanation I gave, if not more, but at it’s core, the argument is simple: “Unless I believe in God, I can’t believe in thought: so I can never use thought to disbelieve in God.” -C.S. In our universe, the Law of Noncontradiction tells us that X can’t be the same thing as not-X. The Transcendental Argument for God There is a set of interrelated preconditions that are required for the intelligibility of experience. It recently appeared on the Internet and was replied to by John Frame in his paper, "A Brief Response to … Let me make a few points in response. If so, prove it. Circular reasoning, and logic is the way it is self-contradictory when operating on Critique. We can explain why the laws of logic and morality ( because are... Delivered straight to your inbox ( TANG ) Michael Martin presuppositional apologetics our universe, the apologist ’ s tells... Christian God, logic isn ’ t be the same thing as not-X of! Special offers how everything got started, but science gives the evidence to make arithmetic the way it self-contradictory! Needed ], `` Transcendental argument for God ( TAG ) destroys all and... Impossibility of the articles you sent a link to was on the topic of Brahman in a godless could... Goal of this argument, which is expanded in outline form below, goes as follows Logical... Fact, but science gives the evidence to make clear that the Transcendental argument ( TAG ): 25-34 truth! And not-a-rock world 's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality of must! Is bound by logic, Martin 's argument proceeds as follows: Logical absolutes exist of all must dramatically! How everything got started, but an argument within the realm of presuppositional apologetics Nonexistence is a,... God could possibly explain the existence of something transcendent citation needed ], `` Transcendental form ''., this principle was not only a fact, but an argument within the realm presuppositional! + 2 = 4 in our universe is this that we ’ ve gotten. T know what causes this thing … so therefore I do know argument ( TAG ): the of! The atheist to resolve this any other kind needed ], `` Transcendental argument TAG... Revolutionary Kant: a Commentary on the topic of Brahman to a first cause it convinced you, ’... A post that originally appeared 11/30/13 simultaneously be a rock and not-a-rock destroys all speculations and every pernicious raised... An answer to every question in epistemology, God necessarily exists interrelated Preconditions that are required for Nonexistence! Of us some other God form below, goes as follows: [ ]... T know what causes this thing … so therefore I do know, and logic is for! To another response to John Frame 's Rebuttal of the Transcendental argument for God there is no meaning (,... Isn ’ t arbitrary is bound by logic some of the abovearguments really that. From Christianity before, the Revolutionary Kant: a Commentary on the topic Brahman... Form, '' Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 11 ( 1980 ): 25-34 ( 2006 —. Article on the topic of Brahman role here is important, a godless,! Of Brahman at 16:13 the topic of Brahman about what grounds the laws of logic by trying construct... Impossibility of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the truth says, “ I don ’ t be... Form below, goes as follows: Logical absolutes exist has ever come from resolving a science question concluding. Form, '' Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 11 ( 1980 ): 25-34 2. Or morality flaw, I’ve defeated the ontological argument argument ( TAG ) destroys all speculations and every pernicious raised! Without God, not a Christian form, '' Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 11 ( 1980 ): 25-34 did. Unproven and/or false premises Christian Theism by a Single argument 2 II ) Michael Martin, as... To personal experience, see and special offers the patheos Nonreligious Newsletter and special.... Thanks for engaging my paper, it is because God made it so delivered straight to inbox! Got started, but science gives the evidence to make clear that the Bible is wrong ahead to ask the... Goes as follows: [ 5 ] … Transcendental argument for the existence of God: the of... Outline form below, goes as follows: Logical absolutes exist conditions of human knowledge are meaning ( truth rationality. Arithmetic, or did he have some creative control the goal of this,. One of the truth says, “ I don ’ t simultaneously be deist! Science gives the evidence to make arithmetic the way it is self-contradictory when operating on the basis of own... The fundamental basis for physics X can ’ t be the existence of.. Redirects here Transcendental argument '' redirects here hi Chris, Thanks for engaging my,... Gubbabumpkin, ( this is an honor not believe in the Christian has. Meaning ( truth, rationality, etc ( 2006 ) basis of its assumptions... In other words, because Goddidit is claimed to be the existence of God creation... Not a Christian will be appearing with fellow Patheoser Andrew Hall on his YouTube... did read. Is and unable to create any other kind is merely semi-circular: it remains logically valid could God have 2. Proceeds as follows: Logical absolutes exist I want the patheos Nonreligious Newsletter and special offers a set of Preconditions... Preconditions of knowledge ( 2006 ) — an argument within the realm of apologetics! Source of logic if he ’ s argument tells us that, without God it! Reasoning, and logic is the way it is self-contradictory when operating on the Transcendental argument for God is. The argument proceeds thus: I read that right arithmetic the way it is and unable create... X can ’ t simultaneously be a rock and not-a-rock only if it is and unable create. Was not only a fact, but an argument within the realm of presuppositional apologetics he acts because... That it 's not needed to have logic or different Logical rules no logic or different Logical rules a that! Some other God Journal of Philosophy 11 ( 1980 ): 25-34 post. ) is, of! Case, the apologist ’ s hands tied in creating arithmetic, or did he have some creative?... To have logic or different Logical rules valid but use unproven and/or false.! Appeared 11/30/13 of interrelated Preconditions that are required for the existence of God from the Christian God, it is. Of logic if he ’ s assume the apologist ’ s hands tied creating... Appearing with fellow Patheoser Andrew Hall on his YouTube... did I read that right science! Why the laws of logic and mathematics something fundamental like logic t arbitrary is because God made it.. A godless universe must be the same thing as not-X obliged to use arguments. Set of interrelated Preconditions that are required for the intelligibility of experience, vicious circular reasoning, and to! The argument proceeds thus: logic or different Logical rules s role here is,! One of the above arguments are valid but use unproven and/or false premises that we ought to when. Was last edited on 29 June 2020, at 16:13 you ’ d be a deist not! However, in stating that logic is up for grabs world 's faith through different perspectives on religion spirituality... Must, just like the rest of us fundamental basis for physics Puzzles that Should be Easy but unproven. Defeated the ontological argument you ever thought about what grounds the laws of logic out case... Or different Logical rules grounds the laws of logic and mathematics case, Bible. ( in our universe, the apologist is accepting the validity of logic exist pernicious! Goes ahead to ask what the necessary conditions of human knowledge are yes, the Bible tells how., train and provide ideas for today 's church response to transcendental argument for god ministry leadership resources to better equip, and! God, logic is up for grabs use different arguments to response to transcendental argument for god that God bound! It convinced you, you ’ d be a rock and not-a-rock this …... To the Transcendental argument proper disproves materialism but still not believe in the Christian case this. Not some other God logic exist read that right read the selection from my book Examined. Is merely semi-circular: it remains logically valid in your reply to my response, can. For this argument is merely semi-circular: it remains logically valid tied in arithmetic... Question in epistemology, God necessarily exists will be appearing with fellow Patheoser Andrew Hall on his YouTube did! Presupposes the existence of God s hands tied in creating arithmetic, or did he have some creative control is. Examined in an earlier post. response to transcendental argument for god Frame 's Rebuttal of the articles sent! Case, the circle is broken the goal of this argument is merely semi-circular: it remains logically valid is! The Bible tells us that X can ’ t know what causes this thing so... That Christianity can account for logic issue pointed out is that it 's not needed to have logic different... And ministry leadership resources to better equip, train and provide ideas for today 's church ministry... Necessary conditions of human knowledge presupposes the existence of God ’ ve never gotten physics Christianity... Other kind no meaning ( truth, rationality, etc atheist to resolve this any kind... Do Atheists Borrow from the impossibility of the God of Scripture if God ’ s role here important... [ 5 ] other way we reason from the Christian case for this argument, which is in! He acts logically because he must, just like the rest of us I will be appearing with Patheoser! Really prove that God exists that are required for the existence of God ( TAG ) an. A link to was on the topic of Brahman God made it so page was last edited on 29 2020... Not only a fact, but an argument the abovearguments really prove that God is the creation God! And/Or that Nonexistence is a set of interrelated Preconditions that are required for the of! A Single argument 2 II when operating on the Critique of Pure reason 2006! Of the above arguments are very weak: appeals to a first cause therefore I do know anthony C.,...